← MindForgeAI homeJanuary 2027 proposed cohort · Admissions not openConnected campus
LaunchpointBY MINDFORGEAI
← Course catalogue

RL & ROBOTICS / SPECIALIST

RL301Reinforcement learning & sequential decisions

24 h productive allocation9 h 36 m learning + 14 h 24 m training4 units · 1 assessed practical brief

Detailed course plan and training brief. A complete taught course pack is in preparation. The linked foundation module, where shown, is a smaller available resource.

BEFORE YOU BEGIN

A clear starting point.

Prerequisites: MTH110 · ML201

Specialist studio; environment and faculty must be confirmed before scheduling

WHAT YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DEMONSTRATE

  1. Explain the assumptions and failure modes in decision processes.
  2. Complete the practical: train tabular Q-learning in a small deterministic environment and test reward and seed sensitivity.
  3. Defend the resulting environment contract with reproducible evidence.

THE SUBJECTS / FOUR CONNECTED UNITS

What you will study.

UNIT 016 h allocated

Decision processes

  • States
  • actions
  • rewards
  • transitions
  • discounting
UNIT 026 h allocated

Learning policies

  • Value functions
  • Bellman relations
  • exploration
  • tabular Q-learning
UNIT 036 h allocated

Environment design

  • Reward specification
  • termination
  • partial observability
  • simulator assumptions
UNIT 046 h allocated

Evaluation

  • Multiple seeds
  • random-policy baseline
  • return variance
  • policy failures

THE TRAINING STUDIO

Make the subject
visible in your work.

Train tabular Q-learning in a small deterministic environment and test reward and seed sensitivity.

Evidence to produce

  • Environment contract
  • learning curves
  • baseline comparison
  • reward critique

Training brief for supervised delivery. Code, datasets, answer keys and environment acceptance must be completed in the full course pack before delivery is confirmed.

ASSESS THE REASONING

A question you
should be able to answer.

How can a policy maximise reward while failing the intended objective?

Review dimensions

Technical correctness · reproducibility · interpretation of results · failure analysis · individual explanation. Course-level rubric and faculty moderation form part of the final adopted teaching pack.

External reference access, hardware, cloud accounts and paid services are separate. No third-party certification is included by implication.

Search by topic or purpose. Press Escape to close.